Financial services · Self-assessment · Free
Financial Services Security Assessment.
Twenty-four questions across the six domains examiners, auditors, and underwriters actually inspect — Customer Data Protection, Identity & Access, Wire Fraud & BEC, Compliance & Governance, Incident Response & Resilience, and Third-Party & Vulnerability. About ten minutes. No email required to see your score.
- Mapped to GLBA Safeguards, FFIEC CAT, NCUA ACET, PCI DSS, NIST CSF 2.0
- Maturity scored Initial → Optimized per domain
- Scoring runs locally in your browser
- Optional written report + roadmap on request
Customer Data Protection Identity & Access Wire Fraud & BEC Compliance & Governance Incident Response & Resilience Third-Party & Vulnerability
Question 1 of 24 0%
What it covers
Six domains. Twenty-four honest questions.
Built around the threat picture financial institutions actually face: ransomware on core and online banking, BEC and wire fraud rerouting customer payments, third-party fintech and core-provider exposure, and the regulator filings that expect documented evidence. The score gives leadership a place to start the conversation — not the conversation itself.
-
Customer Data Protection
Encryption, classification, and DLP for nonpublic personal information (NPI), cardholder data, and core-banking records.
-
Identity & Access
MFA, privileged access, and the controls that protect online banking, core admin, and Microsoft 365 from phishing, BEC, and credential theft.
-
Wire Fraud & BEC
The Microsoft 365 hardening and payment-verification controls that close the doors attackers use to reroute wires, ACH, and member payments.
-
Compliance & Governance
The written information-security program, board reporting, and risk-assessment evidence examiners and auditors expect to see.
-
Incident Response & Resilience
What happens between the alarm and the regulator notification — including the 36-hour banking rule, 72-hour NCUA timeline, and ransomware recovery.
-
Third-Party & Vulnerability
Core providers, fintechs, and the patching cadence that keeps the audit findings — and the attackers — out.
-
What does the assessment cover?
Twenty-four questions across six domains: Customer Data Protection, Identity & Access, Wire Fraud & BEC, Compliance & Governance, Incident Response & Resilience, and Third-Party & Vulnerability. Each answer maps to a maturity level (Initial, Developing, Managed, Optimized) cross-walked to the GLBA Safeguards Rule, FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool, NCUA ACET / Information Security Examination, PCI DSS, and NIST CSF 2.0.
-
How long does it take?
About ten minutes. You can stop at any point — your answers are scored locally in the browser and never leave your device until you choose to request a written report.
-
Do I need to give an email address?
No. The assessment runs entirely client-side. If you want a written report and a 30/60/90-day plan from our team, you can request one at the end — but the score itself is yours immediately.
-
Is this a substitute for an examiner review or audit?
No. It is a fast, honest self-check — meant to surface the obvious gaps before an FFIEC IT exam, NCUA Information Security Examination, GLBA audit, PCI DSS assessment, or — worst case — a wire-fraud or ransomware event. A formal audit, FFIEC CAT / NCUA ACET engagement, or pen test is a separate engagement.
About this financial-services cybersecurity assessment
What this assessment measures — and how community banks and credit unions use it before their FFIEC or NCUA exam.
This cybersecurity readiness assessment is built around the controls and examination expectations that community banks, credit unions, and trust companies face from federal and state financial regulators — the FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool, NCUA's Information Security Examination procedures, the GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR 314 as updated by the FTC in 2023), NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500 for institutions licensed in New York, and the rising overlay of state-level data breach notification statutes. The questions cover the same four maturity domains examiners walk through: governance and risk management, access controls and identity, threat detection and incident response, and third-party risk — with explicit attention to the vendor compromises that have driven 2024-2026 incident statistics at institutions like Patelco, MemberSource, and Marquis.
Scoring is local — nothing leaves your browser unless you explicitly request a written report. The output maps to the FFIEC CAT's five maturity levels (Baseline, Evolving, Intermediate, Advanced, Innovative) so the result speaks the language your examiner uses, and the gap analysis pre-stages the conversation you'd otherwise have during the on-site portion of the exam.
How financial-services security teams typically use these results
Three common patterns: (1) pre-exam baseline — 90 days before an FFIEC IT exam or NCUA Information Security Examination, use the score to prioritize remediation while there's still time to close gaps; (2) board reporting — the maturity-domain breakdown gives a defensible structure for quarterly Cybersecurity Committee updates; (3) insurance renewal diligence — cyber-insurance carriers increasingly require self-assessed maturity scores as part of underwriting, especially after Travelers, AIG, and Beazley tightened MSSP and MDR coverage requirements.
What to do next
Cyberuptive serves community banks, credit unions, trust companies, and registered investment advisors with managed cybersecurity programs built around financial regulator expectations. Our 24/7 SOC-as-a-Service and Managed Detection and Response stack produces FFIEC- and NCUA-aligned evidence as a byproduct of the security work, and our penetration testing services are scoped to map findings against the specific control families your examiner will reference. For institutions facing third-party vendor scrutiny under interagency vendor-management guidance, our vulnerability management program produces the continuous-monitoring evidence that satisfies the new GLBA Safeguards Rule requirements.
Related reading: Credit Unions Are in the Crosshairs: what the 2024-2026 breach wave is teaching us · MDR vs MSSP vs SIEM: a 2026 buyer's guide.
Talk to a real engineer
Want a partner who knows what your examiner actually asks for?
Whether you're shoring up after a near-miss, prepping an FFIEC IT exam or NCUA Information Security Examination, or scoping a managed SOC for the institution — we can help.